I have spent the last week in Berlin, immersed in the history of World War I and II, visiting historical sites where over six million Jews were brutally killed by the totalitarian regime under Adolf Hitler. Some of the most sobering memorial highlights included:
-
The Topography of Terror, which stands as the former site of the Secret Service (SS), the Gestapo headquarters, where many of the regime’s atrocities were planned. This site lays out one of the most in-depth documentation of how the Nazi security systems were operating, offering one of the most clinical depictions of the horrific crimes of the Nazi regime.
-
The Führerbunker Site, where Hitler spent his final days in a bunker before he committed suicide, provides context for the collapse of the Nazi regime. Leaving this exhibit, one feels numb after learning there were over 44 attempts to kill Hitler and every attempt failed – one starts to ask how this insanity could continue for so long.
-
The Holocaust Memorial – The most heart-wrenching site was visiting the memorial to the murdered Jews of Europe, where over 2,711 concrete slabs of varying heights, designed to create a sense of disorientation and reflection. Walking through the memorial, the darkness, despair, and sense of desolation like no one is coming to save me was eclipsed in this architectural design. This memorial provides testimonies, documents, and personal stories of Holocaust victims. This is one of Berlin’s most profound places of remembrance.
As the week progressed, I started to reflect on what I have experienced, and I started to think in the context of the risks we have with AI, with authoritarian dictators controlling what AI can do to accelerate risks of mass destruction and unleash terror from the perspective of Adolf Hitler.
So I decided to ask ChatGPT to outline ideas of how Hitler could use AI to increase his dominance, and it richly surfaced several ideas that any dictator could apply. I also started to question why OpenAI would even allow this type of questioning, as it’s actually a horrific question to surface.
I felt a little better when I asked how Hitler would have made a bomb, and I was advised that this information could not be shared, but I could rephrase the question. So I did and asked how high-level explosives work, and I was then provided a detailed explanation to understand the different components required, as well as how I could source the best science books to explain more about how to achieve the outcomes needed. In other words, I quickly realized I could find out what I needed to answer almost any question as long as I rephrased the question in the context of a research question.
In other words, humans with the ability to ask the right questions from different perspectives in our new world of generative AI can likely find everything they need to know. So universal knowledge access is accelerating, surfacing not just the good to know but also surfacing what may also be best not to know.
Several examples of how AI can be used from an Adolf Hitler perspective are summarized below. This article should provide some sobering reflections on how easy we are making it for future dictators to tap into the ideation of how AI can be applied in more nefarious ways, painting a dystopian future scenario.
1. AI as a Tool of Authoritarian Control. Hitler built his regime on centralized power, surveillance, propaganda, and control over information. He used radio, film, posters, and speeches to spread ideology. Some of the AI techniques that can be applied could include:
-
Generating hyper-targeted disinformation using large language models and deepfakes.
-
Algorithmic content amplification to push extremist narratives through social media.
-
Automated bot armies to distort public discourse and create illusions of mass support.
The implications of diffusion speed in today’s world are enormous, and AI can be enabled easily:
-
Mass surveillance: AI’s ability to track and analyze populations would likely have been seen as a powerful tool for monitoring citizens, identifying dissent, and enforcing ideological conformity.
-
Data manipulation: Modern AI can generate persuasive content at scale — something that could have amplified Nazi propaganda dramatically.
-
Predictive policing: Predictive analytics might have been used to anticipate and suppress resistance movements.
In short, Adolf Hitler would likely have viewed AI as a means to enhance state control and power, not as a technology for the public good. AI can personalize propaganda at scale, a capability that could supercharge authoritarian messaging far beyond what was possible in the 1930s and 1940s.
2. Propaganda and Social Engineering. Hitler understood and exploited mass psychology. In today’s context, AI-powered tools could have made propaganda more targeted and effective, allowing the regime to personalize messaging to individuals and groups. Deepfake technology could have been used to fabricate convincing “proof” of lies, shaping narratives without opposition. Hitler would likely have embraced AI as a weapon of persuasion.
3. Military and Strategic Advantage. The Nazi regime heavily invested in scientific and technological advances to gain military dominance. We can surmise that AI-enabled systems, from advanced logistics to battlefield decision-making, would have been appealing for increasing military power. Examples include: swarm drones for targeted attacks, AI battlefield command systems for real-time decision making, and autonomous cyber-offense operations. Hitler’s focus on rapid innovation suggests he might have prioritized AI in warfare much as he did with rockets and jet aircraft. Hitler likely would have militarized AI to pursue expansionist ambitions.
4. AI in Eugenics and “Ideological Science.” During Hitler’s time, the Nazi ideology was rooted in racial pseudoscience and eugenics programs. In today’s context, AI’s potential could be misused by predictive models or genomic AI to push discriminatory policies. It could manipulate health data or genetics research to justify exclusion or persecution, or use Algorithmic profiling to categorize populations by biased “fitness” criteria. Without strict oversight, AI used on biometric or genomic data can embed systemic bias and discrimination on a massive scale.
5. Ideological Distortion of Technology. However, his worldview was also deeply irrational and ideologically rigid. He might have tried to bend AI development to reinforce racist and pseudoscientific beliefs, corrupting its potential for objective analysis. AI research could have been co-opted to “justify” dangerous ideologies with manipulated data. AI could have been perverted into a tool to reinforce hate and exclusion.
6. Modern Ethical Contrast. Today, democratic societies debate how to ensure AI is aligned with human rights, accountable, and used for good. A regime like Hitler’s represents the nightmare scenario of AI in the hands of those who seek domination rather than dignity.
Conclusion:
These scenarios are not speculation, as many of these technologies already exist and are used by some authoritarian regimes for similar purposes. The danger is that AI lowers the cost of control, allowing fewer people to dominate many. If Hitler had access to AI, he likely would have seen it as a powerful instrument for surveillance, propaganda, military expansion, and ideological control, not as a liberating or democratic force. This hypothetical examination underscores the importance of responsible AI development and strong safeguards to prevent its abuse.
As we all recognize at the same time, AI can be a positive force for good. AI is already improving healthcare, education, and sustainability. On the other hand, it has high risks if we don’t get the right ethical guardrails and regulations in place to ensure AI is not allowed for mass manipulation, surveillance, and violence if placed in the wrong hands.
That’s why global debates on AI ethics, regulation, and human rights protections are not abstract — they’re urgent. Unfortunately, we don’t have enough international legislation alignment, while the Ethicists continue to raise their concerns, the clarity of balancing innovation with AI and safety continues to advance as a risk to the future of humanity.
Despite these sobering perspectives, my confidence in international alignment on AI safety remains an optimistic hope.
Notation: This article has been written to reinforce how crucial it is to accelerate AI ethics, governance, and regulation to prevent such technology from being misused by any authoritarian regime in the future. This article’s research was a result of my immersion into the history of WWWI and WWWII, and recognizing that the risks of surveillance and manipulation are entering a dangerous growth trajectory. Please share with others, as the more we educate the masses, we still have time to get this right.
To stay updated about the latest in AI and its impact, subscribe to our CEO’s weekly AI Insights newsletter
